{"id":264,"date":"2009-02-09T15:22:22","date_gmt":"2009-02-09T19:22:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/?p=264"},"modified":"2009-02-09T16:24:16","modified_gmt":"2009-02-09T20:24:16","slug":"slideshow-predation-on-youtube","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/?p=264","title":{"rendered":"Slideshow Predation on YouTube"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><object width=\"320\" height=\"265\" data=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/PUwyrRAZDzA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\"><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\" \/><param name=\"src\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/PUwyrRAZDzA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1\" \/><param name=\"allowfullscreen\" value=\"true\" \/><\/object><\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;ve been to youtube lately (or&#8230; ever), you have probably noticed evidence of the over-population of Windows Movie Maker users, eager to show off their madskills at generating white text on a blue background with their favorite to 90&#8217;s track pumping. Advanced users will also add real, full-color photographs with transitions such as wipe and crossfades.<\/p>\n<p>For people who are playing with video editing software for the first time, this is great. They can throw something together and upload it to YouTube in a few minutes, and gain some sense of accomplishment without having to do anything overly technical.<\/p>\n<p>For people who are on YouTube looking for an actual video (which I assume is all or most users), this is just awful. I&#8217;ll go out on a limb and assume that most people searching for something on YouTube are not overly critical, they will tolerate mediocre-quality video and amateurish production &#8211; that is the whole appeal, but it is fair to assume that these people are, at the very least, looking for video. Not slideshows.<\/p>\n<p>And you can&#8217;t blame the MovieMakers. Making slideshows is easy, and fun. But what I cannot fathom is how YouTube has fostered the growth of this truly unwelcome phenomena on their service. If I am searching for an eagle attacking a wolf, I would expect, at the very least, to see an eagle attacking a wolf, not a handfull of photographs someone found of the same, with a cheezy hip-hop midi in the background.<\/p>\n<p>Considering all of the energy Google has devoted to<a href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/gadgets\/chocolate-pain\/youtube-antipiracy-video-identification-system-enters-beta-testing-311557.php\" target=\"_blank\"> identifying copyright-protected content<\/a> in YouTube, you would think they could use some of that same mojo for at least identifying what content is actually a video. How many &#8220;videos&#8221; for example, are there out there, that are just a still image with a full-length copyright song? Come on!<\/p>\n<p>The technology required to identify slideshows and still images is pretty basic. This could be implemented where the user uploads a video. They could tick off a radio button that identifies the content as &#8220;full motion video&#8221; or &#8220;slideshow&#8221;. Viewers could also flag content as a slideshow when the creator does not. And furthermore, the video itself could be\u00a0analyzed, either when it is uploaded, or on a\u00a0random\u00a0\/ periodic basis, to determine if there is motion from one frame to the next. Really, there is no excuse for them to leave all these slideshows &#8220;in the soup&#8221; of a site intended for video.<\/p>\n<p>All it takes is a little &#8220;Mark as slideshow&#8221; link, like this:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-266\" title=\"youtube_slideshow1\" src=\"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/02\/youtube_slideshow1.jpg\" alt=\"youtube_slideshow1\" width=\"450\" height=\"154\" srcset=\"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/02\/youtube_slideshow1.jpg 450w, http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/02\/youtube_slideshow1-300x102.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you&#8217;ve been to youtube lately (or&#8230; ever), you have probably noticed evidence of the over-population of Windows Movie Maker users, eager to show off their madskills at generating white text on a blue background with their favorite to 90&#8217;s track pumping. Advanced users will also add real, full-color photographs with transitions such as wipe [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,23,11,10,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=264"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":273,"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/264\/revisions\/273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=264"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/designforpeople.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}